Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 10010110111001101010101… |
… | …001110111010111011011101 |
3 | 101212201202222001201112021220 |
4 | 102313031111032322323131 |
5 | 41333143431131000424 |
6 | 452234413353043553 |
7 | 23321366333153421 |
oct | 2267152516727335 |
9 | 355652861645256 |
10 | 82958723296989 |
11 | 24484662631a21 |
12 | 9379b586b65b9 |
13 | 3739c87c708a7 |
14 | 166b31b904b81 |
15 | 98ce30558579 |
hex | 4b73553baedd |
82958723296989 has 16 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 111029932759680. Its totient is φ = 55096691002560.
The previous prime is 82958723296949. The next prime is 82958723296993. The reversal of 82958723296989 is 98969232785928.
It is not a de Polignac number, because 82958723296989 - 225 = 82958689742557 is a prime.
It is a super-2 number, since 2×829587232969892 (a number of 29 digits) contains 22 as substring.
It is a congruent number.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (82958723296949) by changing a digit.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (29) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 15 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 9356424 + ... + 15920430.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (6939370797480).
Almost surely, 282958723296989 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
82958723296989 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (28071209462691).
82958723296989 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
82958723296989 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 6579940.
The product of its digits is 16930529280, while the sum is 87.
The spelling of 82958723296989 in words is "eighty-two trillion, nine hundred fifty-eight billion, seven hundred twenty-three million, two hundred ninety-six thousand, nine hundred eighty-nine".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.073 sec. • engine limits •