Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 110111011110101… |
… | …100100010111101 |
3 | 2101212110012212022 |
4 | 313132230202331 |
5 | 3401240344121 |
6 | 232210045525 |
7 | 32031421100 |
oct | 6736544275 |
9 | 2355405768 |
10 | 930793661 |
11 | 438455066 |
12 | 21b8798a5 |
13 | 11aab89a5 |
14 | 8b894737 |
15 | 56ab0aab |
hex | 377ac8bd |
930793661 has 6 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 1082760030. Its totient is φ = 797823096.
The previous prime is 930793649. The next prime is 930793691. The reversal of 930793661 is 166397039.
It is a happy number.
It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 919969561 + 10824100 = 30331^2 + 3290^2 .
It is not a de Polignac number, because 930793661 - 26 = 930793597 is a prime.
It is a Duffinian number.
It is a Curzon number.
It is a congruent number.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (930793691) by changing a digit.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (19) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 5 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 9497846 + ... + 9497943.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (180460005).
Almost surely, 2930793661 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
930793661 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (151966369).
930793661 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
930793661 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 18995803 (or 18995796 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 183708, while the sum is 44.
The square root of 930793661 is about 30508.9111736227. The cubic root of 930793661 is about 976.3775962845.
The spelling of 930793661 in words is "nine hundred thirty million, seven hundred ninety-three thousand, six hundred sixty-one".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.077 sec. • engine limits •