Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 10010110111001000… |
… | …00110100101110101 |
3 | 222010201002110200120 |
4 | 21123210012211311 |
5 | 131214242003204 |
6 | 4352450002153 |
7 | 505635434400 |
oct | 113344064565 |
9 | 28121073616 |
10 | 10126125429 |
11 | 4326a2aa02 |
12 | 1b67276359 |
13 | c54b7a4c4 |
14 | 6c0bd4d37 |
15 | 3e3ec36d9 |
hex | 25b906975 |
10126125429 has 96 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 17780103936. Its totient is φ = 5080965120.
The previous prime is 10126125389. The next prime is 10126125439. The reversal of 10126125429 is 92452162101.
10126125429 is digitally balanced in base 2, because in such base it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.
It is not a de Polignac number, because 10126125429 - 27 = 10126125301 is a prime.
It is a self number, because there is not a number n which added to its sum of digits gives 10126125429.
It is a congruent number.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (10126125439) by changing a digit.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (17) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 95 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 2354409 + ... + 2358705.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (185209416).
Almost surely, 210126125429 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
10126125429 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (7653978507).
10126125429 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
10126125429 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 4395 (or 4388 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 8640, while the sum is 33.
The spelling of 10126125429 in words is "ten billion, one hundred twenty-six million, one hundred twenty-five thousand, four hundred twenty-nine".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.068 sec. • engine limits •