10320310033121 has 4 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 11258520036144. Its totient is φ = 9382100030100.

The previous prime is 10320310033109. The next prime is 10320310033123. The reversal of 10320310033121 is 12133001302301.

10320310033121 is digitally balanced in base 2, because in such base it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.

It is a semiprime because it is the product of two primes, and also a Blum integer, because the two primes are equal to 3 mod 4.

It is a cyclic number.

It is a de Polignac number, because none of the positive numbers 2^k-10320310033121 is a prime.

It is a super-2 number, since 2×10320310033121² (a number of 27 digits) contains 22 as substring.

It is a Duffinian number.

It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 10320310033093 and 10320310033102.

It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (10320310033123) by changing a digit.

It is a polite number, since it can be written in 3 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 469105001495 + ... + 469105001516.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (2814630009036).

Almost surely, 2^{10320310033121} is an apocalyptic number.

10320310033121 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (11) formed by its first and last digit.

It is an amenable number.

10320310033121 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (938210003023).

10320310033121 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

10320310033121 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.

The sum of its prime factors is 938210003022.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 324, while the sum is 20.

Adding to 10320310033121 its reverse (12133001302301), we get a palindrome (22453311335422).

The spelling of 10320310033121 in words is "ten trillion, three hundred twenty billion, three hundred ten million, thirty-three thousand, one hundred twenty-one".