Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1001011010000011110111… |
… | …1010111100010010001101 |
3 | 1100121210220202120220002012 |
4 | 2112200331322330102031 |
5 | 2323431104422011341 |
6 | 33555353342311005 |
7 | 2115165054211250 |
oct | 226407572742215 |
9 | 40553822526065 |
10 | 10343320110221 |
11 | 33286396092aa |
12 | 11b0730b88465 |
13 | 5a04a8b40337 |
14 | 27a895771097 |
15 | 12e0c08100eb |
hex | 9683debc48d |
10343320110221 has 48 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 12750381310464. Its totient is φ = 8214511373568.
The previous prime is 10343320110203. The next prime is 10343320110241. The reversal of 10343320110221 is 12201102334301.
It is not a de Polignac number, because 10343320110221 - 26 = 10343320110157 is a prime.
It is a congruent number.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (10343320110241) by changing a digit.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (23) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 47 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 170165591 + ... + 170226363.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (265632943968).
Almost surely, 210343320110221 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
10343320110221 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (2407061200243).
10343320110221 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
10343320110221 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 62298 (or 62279 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 864, while the sum is 23.
Adding to 10343320110221 its reverse (12201102334301), we get a palindrome (22544422444522).
The spelling of 10343320110221 in words is "ten trillion, three hundred forty-three billion, three hundred twenty million, one hundred ten thousand, two hundred twenty-one".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.082 sec. • engine limits •