Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1100011110011… |
… | …01111010010110 |
3 | 21021220220011020 |
4 | 12033031322112 |
5 | 203242334223 |
6 | 14215022010 |
7 | 2410350102 |
oct | 617157226 |
9 | 237826136 |
10 | 104652438 |
11 | 54089a20 |
12 | 2b06a906 |
13 | 188b2327 |
14 | dc82902 |
15 | 92c31e3 |
hex | 63cde96 |
104652438 has 64 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 241864704. Its totient is φ = 29876000.
The previous prime is 104652421. The next prime is 104652439. The reversal of 104652438 is 834256401.
It is a Harshad number since it is a multiple of its sum of digits (33).
It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 104652399 and 104652408.
It is a congruent number.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (104652439) by changing a digit.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 31 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 107293 + ... + 108263.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (3779136).
Almost surely, 2104652438 is an apocalyptic number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 104652438, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (120932352).
104652438 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (137212266).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
104652438 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
104652438 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.
The sum of its prime factors is 1081.
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 23040, while the sum is 33.
The square root of 104652438 is about 10229.9774193299. The cubic root of 104652438 is about 471.2482857529.
The spelling of 104652438 in words is "one hundred four million, six hundred fifty-two thousand, four hundred thirty-eight".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.069 sec. • engine limits •