Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 11111101010101100011… |
… | …10000010100011100110 |
3 | 10212000111200202221022022 |
4 | 33311112032002203212 |
5 | 120311333222400300 |
6 | 2151504241503142 |
7 | 141416316666524 |
oct | 17652616024346 |
9 | 3760450687268 |
10 | 1088073246950 |
11 | 38a4a3a88998 |
12 | 156a61641ab2 |
13 | 7b7b2b7b151 |
14 | 3a93d4b5314 |
15 | 1d48389d285 |
hex | fd563828e6 |
1088073246950 has 24 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 2042730419832. Its totient is φ = 431161733120.
The previous prime is 1088073246947. The next prime is 1088073246977. The reversal of 1088073246950 is 596423708801.
It is a hoax number, since the sum of its digits (53) coincides with the sum of the digits of its distinct prime factors.
It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 1088073246892 and 1088073246901.
It is a congruent number.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 11 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 101683739 + ... + 101694438.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (85113767493).
It is a 1-persistent number, because it is pandigital, but 2⋅1088073246950 = 2176146493900 is not.
Almost surely, 21088073246950 is an apocalyptic number.
1088073246950 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (10) formed by its first and last digit.
1088073246950 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (954657172882).
1088073246950 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
1088073246950 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 203378296 (or 203378291 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 2903040, while the sum is 53.
The spelling of 1088073246950 in words is "one trillion, eighty-eight billion, seventy-three million, two hundred forty-six thousand, nine hundred fifty".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.073 sec. • engine limits •