Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 110010111000001101… |
… | …0101100100100001111 |
3 | 101110000112101201011200 |
4 | 1211300122230210033 |
5 | 3242231104311004 |
6 | 122105441520543 |
7 | 10615366423224 |
oct | 1456032544417 |
9 | 343015351150 |
10 | 109260228879 |
11 | 4237860711a |
12 | 19213043153 |
13 | a3c3174209 |
14 | 5406c5594b |
15 | 2c971bb239 |
hex | 19706ac90f |
109260228879 has 12 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 167103879696. Its totient is φ = 68555437632.
The previous prime is 109260228829. The next prime is 109260228881. The reversal of 109260228879 is 978822062901.
109260228879 is a `hidden beast` number, since 1 + 0 + 9 + 2 + 602 + 28 + 8 + 7 + 9 = 666.
It is not a de Polignac number, because 109260228879 - 29 = 109260228367 is a prime.
It is a super-2 number, since 2×1092602288792 (a number of 23 digits) contains 22 as substring.
It is a congruent number.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (109260228829) by changing a digit.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 11 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 357059419 + ... + 357059724.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (13925323308).
Almost surely, 2109260228879 is an apocalyptic number.
109260228879 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (57843650817).
109260228879 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
109260228879 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.
The sum of its prime factors is 714119166 (or 714119163 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 1741824, while the sum is 54.
It can be divided in two parts, 1092602 and 28879, that added together give a square (1121481 = 10592).
The spelling of 109260228879 in words is "one hundred nine billion, two hundred sixty million, two hundred twenty-eight thousand, eight hundred seventy-nine".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.077 sec. • engine limits •