Search a number
-
+
11213123130229 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin1010001100101100001000…
…1110001001001101110101
31110200222000211102110012011
42203023002032021031311
52432203434010131404
635503123155524221
72235056433664246
oct243130216111565
943628024373164
1011213123130229
113633505755089
1213112182b9671
13634515496837
142aaa0a4b4ccd
15146a2bca3604
hexa32c2389375

11213123130229 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 11213123130230. Its totient is φ = 11213123130228.

The previous prime is 11213123130161. The next prime is 11213123130239. The reversal of 11213123130229 is 92203132131211.

It is a happy number.

It is a strong prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 11013756415204 + 199366715025 = 3318698^2 + 446505^2 .

It is an emirp because it is prime and its reverse (92203132131211) is a distict prime.

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 11213123130229 - 29 = 11213123129717 is a prime.

It is a self number, because there is not a number n which added to its sum of digits gives 11213123130229.

It is a congruent number.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (11213123130239) by changing a digit.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 5606561565114 + 5606561565115.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (5606561565115).

Almost surely, 211213123130229 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

11213123130229 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

11213123130229 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

11213123130229 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 3888, while the sum is 31.

The spelling of 11213123130229 in words is "eleven trillion, two hundred thirteen billion, one hundred twenty-three million, one hundred thirty thousand, two hundred twenty-nine".