Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1101100000100… |
… | …11110101000101 |
3 | 21220020122000012 |
4 | 12300103311011 |
5 | 213002434204 |
6 | 15125000005 |
7 | 2544160445 |
oct | 660236505 |
9 | 256218005 |
10 | 113327429 |
11 | 58a74636 |
12 | 31b53005 |
13 | 1a62ba67 |
14 | 110a0125 |
15 | 9e3876e |
hex | 6c13d45 |
113327429 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 113327430. Its totient is φ = 113327428.
The previous prime is 113327407. The next prime is 113327437. The reversal of 113327429 is 924723311.
It is a strong prime.
It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 111302500 + 2024929 = 10550^2 + 1423^2 .
It is an emirp because it is prime and its reverse (924723311) is a distict prime.
It is a cyclic number.
It is not a de Polignac number, because 113327429 - 28 = 113327173 is a prime.
It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 113327395 and 113327404.
It is a congruent number.
It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (113327479) by changing a digit.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (13) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 56663714 + 56663715.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (56663715).
Almost surely, 2113327429 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
113327429 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).
113327429 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.
113327429 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The product of its digits is 9072, while the sum is 32.
The square root of 113327429 is about 10645.5356370640. The cubic root of 113327429 is about 483.9253194544.
The spelling of 113327429 in words is "one hundred thirteen million, three hundred twenty-seven thousand, four hundred twenty-nine".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.073 sec. • engine limits •