Search a number
-
+
114502335425341 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin11010000010001110100111…
…000001110110101100111101
3120000102022112121222002120121
4122002032213001312230331
5110002001240332102331
61043305351405214541
733055343420266513
oct3202164701665475
9500368477862517
10114502335425341
1133536193306946
1210a133a0561451
134bb76a7014336
14203bd2a7144b3
15d3870636dc11
hex6823a7076b3d

114502335425341 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 114502335425342. Its totient is φ = 114502335425340.

The previous prime is 114502335425339. The next prime is 114502335425371. The reversal of 114502335425341 is 143524533205411.

It is a weak prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 114489550600441 + 12784824900 = 10699979^2 + 113070^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 114502335425341 - 21 = 114502335425339 is a prime.

It is a super-2 number, since 2×1145023354253412 (a number of 29 digits) contains 22 as substring.

Together with 114502335425339, it forms a pair of twin primes.

It is a congruent number.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (114502335425371) by changing a digit.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 57251167712670 + 57251167712671.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (57251167712671).

Almost surely, 2114502335425341 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

114502335425341 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

114502335425341 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

114502335425341 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 864000, while the sum is 43.

The spelling of 114502335425341 in words is "one hundred fourteen trillion, five hundred two billion, three hundred thirty-five million, four hundred twenty-five thousand, three hundred forty-one".