Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 10110111110100000… |
… | …11011101000100100 |
3 | 1011211200112102211222 |
4 | 23133100123220210 |
5 | 200230400430002 |
6 | 5400013515512 |
7 | 614454353300 |
oct | 133720335044 |
9 | 34750472758 |
10 | 12335561252 |
11 | 5260114823 |
12 | 24831a2b98 |
13 | 1217833991 |
14 | 85040ad00 |
15 | 4c2e561a2 |
hex | 2df41ba24 |
12335561252 has 18 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 25111678662. Its totient is φ = 5286669024.
The previous prime is 12335561213. The next prime is 12335561257. The reversal of 12335561252 is 25216553321.
12335561252 is digitally balanced in base 2, because in such base it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.
It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 10333535716 + 2002025536 = 101654^2 + 44744^2 .
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (12335561257) by changing a digit.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (17) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 5 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 31468073 + ... + 31468464.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (1395093259).
Almost surely, 212335561252 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
12335561252 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (12776117410).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
12335561252 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
12335561252 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 62936555 (or 62936546 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its digits is 54000, while the sum is 35.
The spelling of 12335561252 in words is "twelve billion, three hundred thirty-five million, five hundred sixty-one thousand, two hundred fifty-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.072 sec. • engine limits •