Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 11000001111101001… |
… | …01011101000011010 |
3 | 1020121010012001200000 |
4 | 30013310223220122 |
5 | 203124113340402 |
6 | 5551325153430 |
7 | 640360320525 |
oct | 140764535032 |
9 | 36533161600 |
10 | 13016152602 |
11 | 557a308112 |
12 | 26330bb876 |
13 | 12c5838b5b |
14 | 8b6971bbc |
15 | 512a92c1c |
hex | 307d2ba1a |
13016152602 has 48 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 29519616672. Its totient is φ = 4298151600.
The previous prime is 13016152601. The next prime is 13016152607. The reversal of 13016152602 is 20625161031.
13016152602 is a `hidden beast` number, since 1 + 3 + 0 + 1 + 6 + 1 + 52 + 602 = 666.
13016152602 is digitally balanced in base 2 and base 5, because in such bases it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.
It is a Harshad number since it is a multiple of its sum of digits (27).
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (13016152601) by changing a digit.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (17) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 23 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 73149 + ... + 177152.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (614992014).
Almost surely, 213016152602 is an apocalyptic number.
13016152602 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (16503464070).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
13016152602 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
13016152602 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 250425 (or 250413 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 2160, while the sum is 27.
The spelling of 13016152602 in words is "thirteen billion, sixteen million, one hundred fifty-two thousand, six hundred two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.087 sec. • engine limits •