Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 111000100100… |
… | …110100011000 |
3 | 1000220111010120 |
4 | 320210310120 |
5 | 12244041442 |
6 | 1245513240 |
7 | 240026460 |
oct | 70446430 |
9 | 30814116 |
10 | 14830872 |
11 | 840a721 |
12 | 4b72820 |
13 | 30c3684 |
14 | 1d80ba0 |
15 | 147e4ec |
hex | e24d18 |
14830872 has 64 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 43380480. Its totient is φ = 4136832.
The previous prime is 14830859. The next prime is 14830891. The reversal of 14830872 is 27803841.
It is a Smith number, since the sum of its digits (33) coincides with the sum of the digits of its prime factors.
It is a congruent number.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 15 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 6198 + ... + 8250.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (677820).
Almost surely, 214830872 is an apocalyptic number.
14830872 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (12) formed by its first and last digit.
It is an amenable number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 14830872, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (21690240).
14830872 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (28549608).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
14830872 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
14830872 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.
The sum of its prime factors is 2112 (or 2108 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 10752, while the sum is 33.
The square root of 14830872 is about 3851.0871192431. The cubic root of 14830872 is about 245.6908006347.
The spelling of 14830872 in words is "fourteen million, eight hundred thirty thousand, eight hundred seventy-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.069 sec. • engine limits •