Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 11011101111010110… |
… | …11100100000100000 |
3 | 1102102220101120212212 |
4 | 31313223130200200 |
5 | 221000022421202 |
6 | 10501443541252 |
7 | 1035025352240 |
oct | 156753344040 |
9 | 42386346785 |
10 | 14892779552 |
11 | 6352649782 |
12 | 2a7768a828 |
13 | 1534577bc1 |
14 | a13cb3b20 |
15 | 5c26d5652 |
hex | 377adc820 |
14892779552 has 48 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 35479866240. Its totient is φ = 6007170048.
The previous prime is 14892779549. The next prime is 14892779581. The reversal of 14892779552 is 25597729841.
14892779552 is digitally balanced in base 2, because in such base it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.
It is a super-3 number, since 3×148927795523 (a number of 31 digits) contains 333 as substring.
It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 14892779491 and 14892779500.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (17) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 7 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 1951652 + ... + 1959267.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (739163880).
Almost surely, 214892779552 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
14892779552 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (20587086688).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
14892779552 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
14892779552 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 3910953 (or 3910945 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its digits is 12700800, while the sum is 59.
The spelling of 14892779552 in words is "fourteen billion, eight hundred ninety-two million, seven hundred seventy-nine thousand, five hundred fifty-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.071 sec. • engine limits •