Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 110010100000010… |
… | …0001011101110010 |
3 | 11101002202102102020 |
4 | 1211000201131302 |
5 | 11432311322030 |
6 | 440053532310 |
7 | 56665111263 |
oct | 14500413562 |
9 | 4332672366 |
10 | 1694635890 |
11 | 79a63a032 |
12 | 3b3644096 |
13 | 21011bb3c |
14 | 1210ca96a |
15 | 9db94510 |
hex | 65021772 |
1694635890 has 64 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 4191333120. Its totient is φ = 438186240.
The previous prime is 1694635889. The next prime is 1694635931. The reversal of 1694635890 is 985364961.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (13) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 31 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 342756 + ... + 347664.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (65489580).
Almost surely, 21694635890 is an apocalyptic number.
1694635890 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (10) formed by its first and last digit.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 1694635890, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (2095666560).
1694635890 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (2496697230).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
1694635890 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
1694635890 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 5267.
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 1399680, while the sum is 51.
The square root of 1694635890 is about 41165.9554729390. The cubic root of 1694635890 is about 1192.2265800719.
The spelling of 1694635890 in words is "one billion, six hundred ninety-four million, six hundred thirty-five thousand, eight hundred ninety".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.068 sec. • engine limits •