Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1011000111010111011… |
… | …1001101100101000000 |
3 | 200020220001100022002002 |
4 | 2301311313031211000 |
5 | 11112034212000312 |
6 | 223420213043132 |
7 | 16540031645126 |
oct | 2616567154500 |
9 | 606801308062 |
10 | 190955968832 |
11 | 73a90736782 |
12 | 310129264a8 |
13 | 150126c3545 |
14 | 9356cc7916 |
15 | 4e7949b4c2 |
hex | 2c75dcd940 |
190955968832 has 14 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 378928250778. Its totient is φ = 95477984384.
The previous prime is 190955968823. The next prime is 190955968837. The reversal of 190955968832 is 238869559091.
190955968832 is digitally balanced in base 2, because in such base it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.
It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 190955016256 + 952576 = 436984^2 + 976^2 .
It is a congruent number.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (190955968837) by changing a digit.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (19) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 1491843443 + ... + 1491843570.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (27066303627).
Almost surely, 2190955968832 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
190955968832 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (187972281946).
190955968832 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.
190955968832 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 2983687025 (or 2983687015 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 41990400, while the sum is 65.
The spelling of 190955968832 in words is "one hundred ninety billion, nine hundred fifty-five million, nine hundred sixty-eight thousand, eight hundred thirty-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.072 sec. • engine limits •