Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1011010110111010011… |
… | …0101000110010010100 |
3 | 200122122212220220021020 |
4 | 2311232212220302110 |
5 | 11144111030304422 |
6 | 225350250521140 |
7 | 20045324261634 |
oct | 2655646506224 |
9 | 618585826236 |
10 | 195129150612 |
11 | 75832355a40 |
12 | 319984361b0 |
13 | 1552916c586 |
14 | 963123c6c4 |
15 | 5120a2e95c |
hex | 2d6e9a8c94 |
195129150612 has 24 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 496692383712. Its totient is φ = 59130045600.
The previous prime is 195129150551. The next prime is 195129150637. The reversal of 195129150612 is 216051921591.
195129150612 is digitally balanced in base 2, because in such base it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.
It is a congruent number.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (19) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 7 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 739125439 + ... + 739125702.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (20695515988).
Almost surely, 2195129150612 is an apocalyptic number.
195129150612 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (12) formed by its first and last digit.
It is an amenable number.
195129150612 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (301563233100).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
195129150612 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
195129150612 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 1478251159 (or 1478251157 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 48600, while the sum is 42.
The spelling of 195129150612 in words is "one hundred ninety-five billion, one hundred twenty-nine million, one hundred fifty thousand, six hundred twelve".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.085 sec. • engine limits •