Search a number
-
+
200100000028141 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin101101011111110101101001…
…011010111101010111101101
3222020111101002001022211102101
4231133311221122331113231
5202211414300001400031
61545324400533055101
760101514352451203
oct5537655132752755
9866441061284371
10200100000028141
1158837a2a468604
121a538879187491
13878646caab375
14375ac6aa91073
1518200d82d2361
hexb5fd696bd5ed

200100000028141 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 200100000028142. Its totient is φ = 200100000028140.

The previous prime is 200100000028069. The next prime is 200100000028147. The reversal of 200100000028141 is 141820000001002.

It is a happy number.

It is a strong prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 193709443546116 + 6390556482025 = 13917954^2 + 2527955^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 200100000028141 - 27 = 200100000028013 is a prime.

It is a super-2 number, since 2×2001000000281412 (a number of 29 digits) contains 22 as substring.

It is a congruent number.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (200100000028147) by changing a digit.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 100050000014070 + 100050000014071.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (100050000014071).

Almost surely, 2200100000028141 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

200100000028141 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

200100000028141 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

200100000028141 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 128, while the sum is 19.

Adding to 200100000028141 its reverse (141820000001002), we get a palindrome (341920000029143).

The spelling of 200100000028141 in words is "two hundred trillion, one hundred billion, twenty-eight thousand, one hundred forty-one".