Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1011101011110110001… |
… | …1100100000100010100 |
3 | 201012011112010012120100 |
4 | 2322331203210010110 |
5 | 11242113132242322 |
6 | 232120033334100 |
7 | 20334511620306 |
oct | 2727543440424 |
9 | 635145105510 |
10 | 200748712212 |
11 | 78156461824 |
12 | 32aa6407330 |
13 | 15c13485759 |
14 | 9a056d9976 |
15 | 534e069dac |
hex | 2ebd8e4114 |
200748712212 has 288 divisors, whose sum is σ = 539882703360. Its totient is φ = 62837913600.
The previous prime is 200748712211. The next prime is 200748712237. The reversal of 200748712212 is 212217847002.
It is a Harshad number since it is a multiple of its sum of digits (36).
It is a congruent number.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (200748712211) by changing a digit.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 95 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 1019028898 + ... + 1019029094.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (1874592720).
Almost surely, 2200748712212 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 200748712212, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (269941351680).
200748712212 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (339133991148).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
200748712212 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
200748712212 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.
The sum of its prime factors is 511 (or 506 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 25088, while the sum is 36.
The spelling of 200748712212 in words is "two hundred billion, seven hundred forty-eight million, seven hundred twelve thousand, two hundred twelve".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.062 sec. • engine limits •