Search a number
-
+
2141728140341 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin11111001010101000111…
…100011110110000110101
321120202011201100100121002
4133022220330132300311
5240042224400442331
64315521334533045
7310510006551266
oct37125074366065
97522151310532
102141728140341
11756335778389
122a70b8507185
13126c6c1762ca
147593580a96d
153aaa07b09cb
hex1f2a8f1ec35

2141728140341 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 2141728140342. Its totient is φ = 2141728140340.

The previous prime is 2141728140329. The next prime is 2141728140361. The reversal of 2141728140341 is 1430418271412.

It is a weak prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 1495352339716 + 646375800625 = 1222846^2 + 803975^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 2141728140341 - 230 = 2140654398517 is a prime.

It is a Sophie Germain prime.

It is a Curzon number.

It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 2141728140295 and 2141728140304.

It is a congruent number.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (2141728140361) by changing a digit.

It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (23) of ones.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 1070864070170 + 1070864070171.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (1070864070171).

Almost surely, 22141728140341 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

2141728140341 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

2141728140341 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

2141728140341 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 43008, while the sum is 38.

The spelling of 2141728140341 in words is "two trillion, one hundred forty-one billion, seven hundred twenty-eight million, one hundred forty thousand, three hundred forty-one".