Search a number
-
+
232313311301 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin1101100001011011110…
…0111101000001000101
3211012122022110222101212
43120112330331001011
512301234201430201
6254420120301205
722532640364451
oct3302674750105
9735568428355
10232313311301
118a583898255
1239035311805
1318ba3a3a216
14b35b861661
15609a1edabb
hex3616f3d045

232313311301 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 232313311302. Its totient is φ = 232313311300.

The previous prime is 232313311267. The next prime is 232313311361. The reversal of 232313311301 is 103113313232.

232313311301 is digitally balanced in base 2, because in such base it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.

It is a weak prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 224416323076 + 7896988225 = 473726^2 + 88865^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 232313311301 - 222 = 232309116997 is a prime.

It is a congruent number.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (232313311361) by changing a digit.

It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (19) of ones.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 116156655650 + 116156655651.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (116156655651).

Almost surely, 2232313311301 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

232313311301 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

232313311301 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

232313311301 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 972, while the sum is 23.

Adding to 232313311301 its reverse (103113313232), we get a palindrome (335426624533).

The spelling of 232313311301 in words is "two hundred thirty-two billion, three hundred thirteen million, three hundred eleven thousand, three hundred one".