Search a number
-
+
2587274089 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin1001101000110110…
…1010101101101001
320200022102010211021
42122031222231221
520244320232324
61104422132441
7121054316101
oct23215525551
96608363737
102587274089
1111084a3354
12602581121
1332303871a
141a788c201
15102219ae4
hex9a36ab69

2587274089 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 2587274090. Its totient is φ = 2587274088.

The previous prime is 2587274059. The next prime is 2587274093. The reversal of 2587274089 is 9804727852.

It is a happy number.

It is a strong prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 2577085225 + 10188864 = 50765^2 + 3192^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 2587274089 - 27 = 2587273961 is a prime.

It is a super-2 number, since 2×25872740892 = 13387974423221559842, which contains 22 as substring.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (2587274059) by changing a digit.

It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (17) of ones.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 1293637044 + 1293637045.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (1293637045).

Almost surely, 22587274089 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

2587274089 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

2587274089 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

2587274089 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 2257920, while the sum is 52.

The square root of 2587274089 is about 50865.2542409846. The cubic root of 2587274089 is about 1372.8217347655.

It can be divided in two parts, 2587 and 274089, that added together give a square (276676 = 5262).

The spelling of 2587274089 in words is "two billion, five hundred eighty-seven million, two hundred seventy-four thousand, eighty-nine".