Search a number
-
+
264517681 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin11111100010000…
…11100000110001
3200102201220001011
433301003200301
51020204031211
642125310521
76361235401
oct1761034061
9612656034
10264517681
1112634a05a
1274705441
1342a5664c
14271b8801
1518350921
hexfc43831

264517681 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 264517682. Its totient is φ = 264517680.

The previous prime is 264517679. The next prime is 264517741. The reversal of 264517681 is 186715462.

264517681 = T13278 + T13279 + T13280.

It is a weak prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 216090000 + 48427681 = 14700^2 + 6959^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 264517681 - 21 = 264517679 is a prime.

It is a super-2 number, since 2×2645176812 = 139939207123235522, which contains 22 as substring.

Together with 264517679, it forms a pair of twin primes.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (264517621) by changing a digit.

It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (13) of ones.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 132258840 + 132258841.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (132258841).

Almost surely, 2264517681 is an apocalyptic number.

264517681 is the 13280-th centered triangular number.

It is an amenable number.

264517681 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

264517681 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

264517681 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.

The product of its digits is 80640, while the sum is 40.

The square root of 264517681 is about 16263.9995388588. Note that the first 3 decimals coincide. The cubic root of 264517681 is about 641.9259052437.

The spelling of 264517681 in words is "two hundred sixty-four million, five hundred seventeen thousand, six hundred eighty-one".