Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1000110010110000000… |
… | …11111101010010111001 |
3 | 1001212211121202111012110 |
4 | 10121120003331102321 |
5 | 14422223014040400 |
6 | 350443330202533 |
7 | 30553641226233 |
oct | 4313003752271 |
9 | 1055747674173 |
10 | 302125143225 |
11 | 107148848914 |
12 | 4a679123449 |
13 | 2264b1b0bc9 |
14 | 108a1495253 |
15 | 7cd4040e50 |
hex | 46580fd4b9 |
302125143225 has 24 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 502866028800. Its totient is φ = 160051971520.
The previous prime is 302125143211. The next prime is 302125143227. The reversal of 302125143225 is 522341521203.
It is not a de Polignac number, because 302125143225 - 24 = 302125143209 is a prime.
It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 302125143192 and 302125143201.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (302125143227) by changing a digit.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (19) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 23 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 13506729 + ... + 13529078.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (20952751200).
Almost surely, 2302125143225 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
302125143225 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (200740885575).
302125143225 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
302125143225 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 27035969 (or 27035964 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 14400, while the sum is 30.
Adding to 302125143225 its reverse (522341521203), we get a palindrome (824466664428).
The spelling of 302125143225 in words is "three hundred two billion, one hundred twenty-five million, one hundred forty-three thousand, two hundred twenty-five".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.078 sec. • engine limits •