Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 111001111000… |
… | …1110000010001 |
3 | 2010002221212011 |
4 | 1303301300101 |
5 | 30232202403 |
6 | 3002302521 |
7 | 515654665 |
oct | 163616021 |
9 | 63087764 |
10 | 30350353 |
11 | 1614a740 |
12 | a1b7a41 |
13 | 63985b7 |
14 | 40608a5 |
15 | 29e7a6d |
hex | 1cf1c11 |
30350353 has 12 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 34948368. Its totient is φ = 26135640.
The previous prime is 30350351. The next prime is 30350357. The reversal of 30350353 is 35305303.
It is a happy number.
It is not a de Polignac number, because 30350353 - 21 = 30350351 is a prime.
It is a super-2 number, since 2×303503532 = 1842287854449218, which contains 22 as substring.
It is a Duffinian number.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (30350351) by changing a digit.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 11 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 150 + ... + 7792.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (2912364).
Almost surely, 230350353 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
30350353 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (4598015).
30350353 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
30350353 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.
The sum of its prime factors is 7692 (or 7673 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 2025, while the sum is 22.
The square root of 30350353 is about 5509.1154462400. The cubic root of 30350353 is about 311.9281591386.
Multiplying 30350353 by its sum of digits (22), we get a palindrome (667707766).
Adding to 30350353 its reverse (35305303), we get a palindrome (65655656).
It can be divided in two parts, 30350 and 353, that added together give a palindrome (30703).
The spelling of 30350353 in words is "thirty million, three hundred fifty thousand, three hundred fifty-three".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.069 sec. • engine limits •