Search a number
-
+
3084097801 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin1011011111010011…
…1001100100001001
321221221021101211111
42313310321210021
522304012112201
61230010530321
7136266253531
oct26764714411
97857241744
103084097801
111342990364
12720a369a1
133a1c4ab55
142138584c1
15130b56b51
hexb7d39909

3084097801 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 3084097802. Its totient is φ = 3084097800.

The previous prime is 3084097799. The next prime is 3084097811. The reversal of 3084097801 is 1087904803.

It is a weak prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 2593253776 + 490844025 = 50924^2 + 22155^2 .

It is an emirp because it is prime and its reverse (1087904803) is a distict prime.

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 3084097801 - 21 = 3084097799 is a prime.

It is a super-2 number, since 2×30840978012 = 19023318492266071202, which contains 22 as substring.

Together with 3084097799, it forms a pair of twin primes.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (3084097811) by changing a digit.

It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (17) of ones.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 1542048900 + 1542048901.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (1542048901).

Almost surely, 23084097801 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

3084097801 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

3084097801 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

3084097801 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 48384, while the sum is 40.

The square root of 3084097801 is about 55534.6540549232. The cubic root of 3084097801 is about 1455.6022354720.

The spelling of 3084097801 in words is "three billion, eighty-four million, ninety-seven thousand, eight hundred one".