Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1001000101010101001… |
… | …11000011100011111000 |
3 | 1002211120210020020100020 |
4 | 10202222213003203320 |
5 | 20103140100311412 |
6 | 355213214210440 |
7 | 31356062213163 |
oct | 4425247034370 |
9 | 1084523206306 |
10 | 312100010232 |
11 | 1103a735705a |
12 | 505a17b3a20 |
13 | 2357a90b78a |
14 | 1116a154ada |
15 | 81b9ad718c |
hex | 48aa9c38f8 |
312100010232 has 192 divisors, whose sum is σ = 843039187200. Its totient is φ = 95999016960.
The previous prime is 312100010171. The next prime is 312100010237. The reversal of 312100010232 is 232010001213.
It is a congruent number.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (312100010237) by changing a digit.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 47 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 256449688 + ... + 256450904.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (4390829100).
Almost surely, 2312100010232 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 312100010232, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (421519593600).
312100010232 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (530939176968).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
312100010232 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
312100010232 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.
The sum of its prime factors is 1494 (or 1401 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 72, while the sum is 15.
Adding to 312100010232 its reverse (232010001213), we get a palindrome (544110011445).
The spelling of 312100010232 in words is "three hundred twelve billion, one hundred million, ten thousand, two hundred thirty-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.068 sec. • engine limits •