Search a number
-
+
31234946988181 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin1110001101000011100111…
…11010110111100010010101
311002121000212011022210212011
413012201303322313202111
513043223132412110211
6150233045255024221
76402436050525166
oct706416372674225
9132530764283764
1031234946988181
119a52737310662
12360566066b071
13145759ac79691
1479dacad4176d
1539275ca72921
hex1c6873eb7895

31234946988181 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 31234946988182. Its totient is φ = 31234946988180.

The previous prime is 31234946988163. The next prime is 31234946988199. The reversal of 31234946988181 is 18188964943213.

It is a balanced prime because it is at equal distance from previous prime (31234946988163) and next prime (31234946988199).

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 29131214307556 + 2103732680625 = 5397334^2 + 1450425^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 31234946988181 - 27 = 31234946988053 is a prime.

It is a super-2 number, since 2×312349469881812 (a number of 28 digits) contains 22 as substring.

It is a congruent number.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (31234946988781) by changing a digit.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 15617473494090 + 15617473494091.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (15617473494091).

Almost surely, 231234946988181 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

31234946988181 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

31234946988181 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

31234946988181 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.

The product of its digits is 71663616, while the sum is 67.

The spelling of 31234946988181 in words is "thirty-one trillion, two hundred thirty-four billion, nine hundred forty-six million, nine hundred eighty-eight thousand, one hundred eighty-one".