Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1100100001011110… |
… | …1111111010100110 |
3 | 22200021120110121220 |
4 | 3020113233322212 |
5 | 23341041400044 |
6 | 1313324121210 |
7 | 146206466412 |
oct | 31027577246 |
9 | 8607513556 |
10 | 3361668774 |
11 | 1475635562 |
12 | 799996206 |
13 | 4175c4a29 |
14 | 23c66dd42 |
15 | 14a1d5019 |
hex | c85efea6 |
3361668774 has 16 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 7118828208. Its totient is φ = 1054641152.
The previous prime is 3361668767. The next prime is 3361668809. The reversal of 3361668774 is 4778661633.
It is a super-2 number, since 2×33616687742 = 22601633892173326152, which contains 22 as substring.
It is a Harshad number since it is a multiple of its sum of digits (51).
It is a congruent number.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (19) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 7 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 16478667 + ... + 16478870.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (444926763).
Almost surely, 23361668774 is an apocalyptic number.
3361668774 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (34) formed by its first and last digit.
3361668774 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (3757159434).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
3361668774 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
3361668774 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 32957559.
The product of its digits is 3048192, while the sum is 51.
The square root of 3361668774 is about 57979.8997412034. The cubic root of 3361668774 is about 1498.0223974267.
The spelling of 3361668774 in words is "three billion, three hundred sixty-one million, six hundred sixty-eight thousand, seven hundred seventy-four".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.069 sec. • engine limits •