Search a number
-
+
3398259936769 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin110001011100111000000…
…100111000111000000001
3110000212111120121021102121
4301130320010320320001
5421134114020434034
611121050012044241
7500342022602335
oct61347004707001
913025446537377
103398259936769
1110a0215161895
1246a732463681
131b85ba805419
14ba695d457c5
155d5e34c31b4
hex31738138e01

3398259936769 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 3398259936770. Its totient is φ = 3398259936768.

The previous prime is 3398259936707. The next prime is 3398259936839. The reversal of 3398259936769 is 9676399528933.

It is a happy number.

It is a weak prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 3270625229169 + 127634707600 = 1808487^2 + 357260^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 3398259936769 - 217 = 3398259805697 is a prime.

It is a super-3 number, since 3×33982599367693 (a number of 39 digits) contains 333 as substring. Note that it is a super-d number also for d = 2.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (3398259936469) by changing a digit.

It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (17) of ones.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 1699129968384 + 1699129968385.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (1699129968385).

Almost surely, 23398259936769 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

3398259936769 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

3398259936769 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

3398259936769 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.

The product of its digits is 3571283520, while the sum is 79.

The spelling of 3398259936769 in words is "three trillion, three hundred ninety-eight billion, two hundred fifty-nine million, nine hundred thirty-six thousand, seven hundred sixty-nine".