Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 100111001001110101110011… |
… | …0010010001000111101000010 |
3 | 1200011102022212220012202002220 |
4 | 1032103223212102020331002 |
5 | 330120122411421041002 |
6 | 3220251121000151510 |
7 | 132354041545063521 |
oct | 11623534622107502 |
9 | 1604368786182086 |
10 | 344400111112002 |
11 | 9a8112a3259660 |
12 | 32763070468596 |
13 | 11a22a3913a88a |
14 | 61090a90984b8 |
15 | 29c3985a7b7bc |
hex | 1393ae6488f42 |
344400111112002 has 16 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 751418424244512. Its totient is φ = 104363670033920.
The previous prime is 344400111111989. The next prime is 344400111112049. The reversal of 344400111112002 is 200211111004443.
It is a happy number.
It is a super-2 number, since 2×3444001111120022 (a number of 30 digits) contains 22 as substring.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (23) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 7 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 2609091750783 + ... + 2609091750914.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (46963651515282).
Almost surely, 2344400111112002 is an apocalyptic number.
344400111112002 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (407018313132510).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
344400111112002 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
344400111112002 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 5218183501713.
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 768, while the sum is 24.
Adding to 344400111112002 its reverse (200211111004443), we get a palindrome (544611222116445).
The spelling of 344400111112002 in words is "three hundred forty-four trillion, four hundred billion, one hundred eleven million, one hundred twelve thousand, two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.086 sec. • engine limits •