Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1001001011111… |
… | …1010010000101 |
3 | 2200111122021121 |
4 | 2102333102011 |
5 | 34331012404 |
6 | 3453513541 |
7 | 645342601 |
oct | 222772205 |
9 | 80448247 |
10 | 38532229 |
11 | 1a82891a |
12 | 10aa28b1 |
13 | 7ca1748 |
14 | 5190501 |
15 | 35b1e54 |
hex | 24bf485 |
38532229 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 38532230. Its totient is φ = 38532228.
The previous prime is 38532211. The next prime is 38532239. The reversal of 38532229 is 92223583.
38532229 is digitally balanced in base 2, because in such base it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.
It is a strong prime.
It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 34492129 + 4040100 = 5873^2 + 2010^2 .
It is a cyclic number.
It is not a de Polignac number, because 38532229 - 213 = 38524037 is a prime.
It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 38532194 and 38532203.
It is a congruent number.
It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (38532239) by changing a digit.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (13) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 19266114 + 19266115.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (19266115).
Almost surely, 238532229 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
38532229 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).
38532229 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.
38532229 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The product of its digits is 25920, while the sum is 34.
The square root of 38532229 is about 6207.4333665373. The cubic root of 38532229 is about 337.7598664333.
The spelling of 38532229 in words is "thirty-eight million, five hundred thirty-two thousand, two hundred twenty-nine".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.078 sec. • engine limits •