Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1110011110110000… |
… | …1001001011011001 |
3 | 101000220021120212112 |
4 | 3213230021023121 |
5 | 30430044440300 |
6 | 1441414122105 |
7 | 165216610535 |
oct | 34754111331 |
9 | 11026246775 |
10 | 3887108825 |
11 | 1715198436 |
12 | 905950335 |
13 | 49c4163c2 |
14 | 28c368bc5 |
15 | 17b3c5e35 |
hex | e7b092d9 |
3887108825 has 24 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 5092590720. Its totient is φ = 2935051200.
The previous prime is 3887108773. The next prime is 3887108843. The reversal of 3887108825 is 5288017883.
3887108825 is digitally balanced in base 3, because in such base it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.
It is not a de Polignac number, because 3887108825 - 214 = 3887092441 is a prime.
It is a Smith number, since the sum of its digits (50) coincides with the sum of the digits of its prime factors.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (17) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 23 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 113627 + ... + 143823.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (212191280).
Almost surely, 23887108825 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
3887108825 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1205481895).
3887108825 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
3887108825 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 30497 (or 30492 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 860160, while the sum is 50.
The square root of 3887108825 is about 62346.6825500764. The cubic root of 3887108825 is about 1572.3246864390.
The spelling of 3887108825 in words is "three billion, eight hundred eighty-seven million, one hundred eight thousand, eight hundred twenty-five".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.066 sec. • engine limits •