Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 101000001110110100… |
… | …011011100000100100 |
3 | 11010111120012220202110 |
4 | 220032310123200210 |
5 | 1201432231020043 |
6 | 31502305241020 |
7 | 3056331322125 |
oct | 501664334044 |
9 | 133446186673 |
10 | 43198298148 |
11 | 17358349855 |
12 | 8457033170 |
13 | 40c5876585 |
14 | 213b27204c |
15 | 11cc69ab33 |
hex | a0ed1b824 |
43198298148 has 96 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 108393707520. Its totient is φ = 13356386560.
The previous prime is 43198298119. The next prime is 43198298149. The reversal of 43198298148 is 84189289134.
It is a Smith number, since the sum of its digits (57) coincides with the sum of the digits of its prime factors.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (43198298149) by changing a digit.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 31 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 1878343 + ... + 1901201.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (1129101120).
Almost surely, 243198298148 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 43198298148, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (54196853760).
43198298148 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (65195409372).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
43198298148 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
43198298148 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 23097 (or 23095 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its digits is 3981312, while the sum is 57.
The spelling of 43198298148 in words is "forty-three billion, one hundred ninety-eight million, two hundred ninety-eight thousand, one hundred forty-eight".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.069 sec. • engine limits •