Search a number
-
+
44660041 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin1010101001011…
…1010101001001
310010000222001121
42222113111021
542413110131
64233115241
71051414126
oct252272511
9103028047
1044660041
1123233828
1212b58b21
13933897a
145d0774d
153dc2911
hex2a97549

44660041 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 44660042. Its totient is φ = 44660040.

The previous prime is 44660039. The next prime is 44660081. The reversal of 44660041 is 14006644.

44660041 is digitally balanced in base 2, because in such base it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.

It is a weak prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 23232400 + 21427641 = 4820^2 + 4629^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 44660041 - 21 = 44660039 is a prime.

Together with 44660039, it forms a pair of twin primes.

It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 44659988 and 44660015.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (44660081) by changing a digit.

It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (13) of ones.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 22330020 + 22330021.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (22330021).

Almost surely, 244660041 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

44660041 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

44660041 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

44660041 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 2304, while the sum is 25.

The square root of 44660041 is about 6682.8168462109. The cubic root of 44660041 is about 354.7913632226.

Adding to 44660041 its reverse (14006644), we get a palindrome (58666685).

The spelling of 44660041 in words is "forty-four million, six hundred sixty thousand, forty-one".