Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1011000101011… |
… | …0010110000100 |
3 | 10020110222200100 |
4 | 2301112112010 |
5 | 43400203022 |
6 | 4340244100 |
7 | 1103111211 |
oct | 261262604 |
9 | 106428610 |
10 | 46491012 |
11 | 24274427 |
12 | 136a0630 |
13 | 982a199 |
14 | 6262b08 |
15 | 41351ac |
hex | 2c56584 |
46491012 has 36 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 117742716. Its totient is φ = 15467520.
The previous prime is 46490993. The next prime is 46491061. The reversal of 46491012 is 21019464.
46491012 is a `hidden beast` number, since 4 + 649 + 1 + 0 + 12 = 666.
It can be written as a sum of positive squares in 2 ways, for example, as 19927296 + 26563716 = 4464^2 + 5154^2 .
It is a tau number, because it is divible by the number of its divisors (36).
It is a super-2 number, since 2×464910122 = 4322828393568288, which contains 22 as substring.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (11) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 11 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 26548 + ... + 28244.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (3270631).
Almost surely, 246491012 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
46491012 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (71251704).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
46491012 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
46491012 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 2468 (or 2463 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 1728, while the sum is 27.
The square root of 46491012 is about 6818.4317845088. The cubic root of 46491012 is about 359.5751469562.
The spelling of 46491012 in words is "forty-six million, four hundred ninety-one thousand, twelve".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.087 sec. • engine limits •