Search a number
-
+
4670446330729 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin100001111110110110001…
…0010110110001101101001
3121112111020102202010221201
41003331230102312031221
51103010033230040404
613533323505404201
7661300004535424
oct103755422661551
917474212663851
104670446330729
1115407a8217103
126351b7039661
1327b5624b40ba
1412209d5c09bb
15817506eeca4
hex43f6c4b6369

4670446330729 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 4670446330730. Its totient is φ = 4670446330728.

The previous prime is 4670446330727. The next prime is 4670446330741. The reversal of 4670446330729 is 9270336440764.

It is a weak prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 4628780131600 + 41666199129 = 2151460^2 + 204123^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 4670446330729 - 21 = 4670446330727 is a prime.

Together with 4670446330727, it forms a pair of twin primes.

It is a self number, because there is not a number n which added to its sum of digits gives 4670446330729.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (4670446330727) by changing a digit.

It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (23) of ones.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 2335223165364 + 2335223165365.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (2335223165365).

Almost surely, 24670446330729 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

4670446330729 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

4670446330729 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

4670446330729 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 18289152, while the sum is 55.

The spelling of 4670446330729 in words is "four trillion, six hundred seventy billion, four hundred forty-six million, three hundred thirty thousand, seven hundred twenty-nine".