Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 100010001100111111000… |
… | …0001010111001010101101 |
3 | 121122101121102112120020200 |
4 | 1010121332001113022231 |
5 | 1104004223434224302 |
6 | 13555304400304113 |
7 | 663423263020053 |
oct | 104317601271255 |
9 | 17571542476220 |
10 | 4700808508077 |
11 | 1552668942360 |
12 | 63b06b312039 |
13 | 281390907006 |
14 | 12373db861d3 |
15 | 8242b01a81c |
hex | 4467e0572ad |
4700808508077 has 12 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 7407334618944. Its totient is φ = 2848974853320.
The previous prime is 4700808508013. The next prime is 4700808508133. The reversal of 4700808508077 is 7708058080074.
It is not a de Polignac number, because 4700808508077 - 26 = 4700808508013 is a prime.
It is a super-2 number, since 2×47008085080772 (a number of 26 digits) contains 22 as substring.
It is a Smith number, since the sum of its digits (54) coincides with the sum of the digits of its prime factors.
It is a congruent number.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (4700808508177) by changing a digit.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 11 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 23741457013 + ... + 23741457210.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (617277884912).
Almost surely, 24700808508077 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
4700808508077 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (2706526110867).
4700808508077 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
4700808508077 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 47482914240 (or 47482914237 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 3512320, while the sum is 54.
The spelling of 4700808508077 in words is "four trillion, seven hundred billion, eight hundred eight million, five hundred eight thousand, seventy-seven".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.079 sec. • engine limits •