Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 110001100101111111… |
… | …110010111110101010 |
3 | 12002110010211110101020 |
4 | 301211333302332222 |
5 | 1333024203032000 |
6 | 40244010033310 |
7 | 3563414405652 |
oct | 614577627652 |
9 | 162403743336 |
10 | 53250830250 |
11 | 20646783a22 |
12 | a3a1718836 |
13 | 50383c7817 |
14 | 281238b362 |
15 | 15b9e83ba0 |
hex | c65ff2faa |
53250830250 has 64 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 133051127040. Its totient is φ = 14185579200.
The previous prime is 53250830239. The next prime is 53250830267. The reversal of 53250830250 is 5203805235.
It is a Curzon number.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (23) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 31 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 701136 + ... + 773364.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (2078923860).
Almost surely, 253250830250 is an apocalyptic number.
53250830250 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (50) formed by its first and last digit.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 53250830250, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (66525563520).
53250830250 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (79800296790).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
53250830250 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
53250830250 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 73232 (or 73222 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 36000, while the sum is 33.
The spelling of 53250830250 in words is "fifty-three billion, two hundred fifty million, eight hundred thirty thousand, two hundred fifty".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.086 sec. • engine limits •