Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1100111100100… |
… | …0100101101010 |
3 | 10210011200012120 |
4 | 3033020211222 |
5 | 102400031421 |
6 | 5215452110 |
7 | 1226351040 |
oct | 317104552 |
9 | 123150176 |
10 | 54298986 |
11 | 287176a5 |
12 | 16227036 |
13 | b3320a1 |
14 | 72d6390 |
15 | 4b788c6 |
hex | 33c896a |
54298986 has 64 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 132772608. Its totient is φ = 14450688.
The previous prime is 54298973. The next prime is 54298997. The reversal of 54298986 is 68989245.
54298986 is digitally balanced in base 2, because in such base it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.
It is a Harshad number since it is a multiple of its sum of digits (51).
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (13) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 31 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 80346 + ... + 81018.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (2074572).
Almost surely, 254298986 is an apocalyptic number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 54298986, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (66386304).
54298986 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (78473622).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
54298986 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
54298986 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 815.
The product of its digits is 1244160, while the sum is 51.
The square root of 54298986 is about 7368.7845673489. The cubic root of 54298986 is about 378.6726217338.
The spelling of 54298986 in words is "fifty-four million, two hundred ninety-eight thousand, nine hundred eighty-six".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.083 sec. • engine limits •