Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1001111111110… |
… | …10110001111101 |
3 | 12211210202202001 |
4 | 10333322301331 |
5 | 132432132301 |
6 | 12153302301 |
7 | 2035560334 |
oct | 477726175 |
9 | 184722661 |
10 | 83864701 |
11 | 43380878 |
12 | 24104991 |
13 | 144b44ab |
14 | b1d0d1b |
15 | 7568c01 |
hex | 4ffac7d |
83864701 has 4 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 83883100. Its totient is φ = 83846304.
The previous prime is 83864653. The next prime is 83864707. The reversal of 83864701 is 10746838.
It is a happy number.
83864701 is nontrivially palindromic in base 14.
It is a semiprime because it is the product of two primes.
It can be written as a sum of positive squares in 2 ways, for example, as 15405625 + 68459076 = 3925^2 + 8274^2 .
It is a cyclic number.
It is not a de Polignac number, because 83864701 - 29 = 83864189 is a prime.
It is a Duffinian number.
It is a congruent number.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (83864707) by changing a digit.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (19) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 3 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 3295 + ... + 13363.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (20970775).
Almost surely, 283864701 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
83864701 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (18399).
83864701 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
83864701 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 18398.
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 32256, while the sum is 37.
The square root of 83864701 is about 9157.7672497176. The cubic root of 83864701 is about 437.7166509004.
The spelling of 83864701 in words is "eighty-three million, eight hundred sixty-four thousand, seven hundred one".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.088 sec. • engine limits •