Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 110010001001110… |
… | …010111111101100 |
3 | 2011122022000120000 |
4 | 302021302333230 |
5 | 3210401211342 |
6 | 215254424300 |
7 | 26565012456 |
oct | 6211627754 |
9 | 2148260500 |
10 | 841428972 |
11 | 3a1a6804a |
12 | 1b5962090 |
13 | 105429c87 |
14 | 7da712d6 |
15 | 4dd0c44c |
hex | 32272fec |
841428972 has 60 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 2236994760. Its totient is φ = 275716224.
The previous prime is 841428971. The next prime is 841428979. The reversal of 841428972 is 279824148.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (841428971) by changing a digit.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (17) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 19 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 2893 + ... + 41124.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (37283246).
Almost surely, 2841428972 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 841428972, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (1118497380).
841428972 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (1395565788).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
841428972 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
841428972 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 44092 (or 44081 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its digits is 258048, while the sum is 45.
The square root of 841428972 is about 29007.3951260709. The cubic root of 841428972 is about 944.0735288772.
The spelling of 841428972 in words is "eight hundred forty-one million, four hundred twenty-eight thousand, nine hundred seventy-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.067 sec. • engine limits •