Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 110101101100001… |
… | …111011100100101 |
3 | 2022202222212122120 |
4 | 311230033130211 |
5 | 3321100240203 |
6 | 225215020153 |
7 | 31215406032 |
oct | 6554173445 |
9 | 2282885576 |
10 | 900790053 |
11 | 422521999 |
12 | 21180a659 |
13 | 114812187 |
14 | 878c4389 |
15 | 54135b53 |
hex | 35b0f725 |
900790053 has 8 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 1204843488. Its totient is φ = 598631664.
The previous prime is 900790039. The next prime is 900790063. The reversal of 900790053 is 350097009.
It is a sphenic number, since it is the product of 3 distinct primes.
It is not a de Polignac number, because 900790053 - 25 = 900790021 is a prime.
It is a super-2 number, since 2×9007900532 = 1622845439167485618, which contains 22 as substring.
It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 900789996 and 900790023.
It is a congruent number.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (900790003) by changing a digit.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (17) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 7 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 472651 + ... + 474552.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (150605436).
Almost surely, 2900790053 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
900790053 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (304053435).
900790053 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
900790053 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 947523.
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 8505, while the sum is 33.
The square root of 900790053 is about 30013.1646615281. The cubic root of 900790053 is about 965.7718159732.
The spelling of 900790053 in words is "nine hundred million, seven hundred ninety thousand, fifty-three".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.067 sec. • engine limits •