Search a number
-
+
901814261 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin110101110000001…
…001011111110101
32022211220220121012
4311300021133311
53321331024021
6225253002005
731230203045
oct6560113765
92284826535
10901814261
11423061447
12212023305
13114ab040a
1487aad725
155428935b
hex35c097f5

901814261 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 901814262. Its totient is φ = 901814260.

The previous prime is 901814237. The next prime is 901814279. The reversal of 901814261 is 162418109.

It is a strong prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 892874161 + 8940100 = 29881^2 + 2990^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 901814261 - 26 = 901814197 is a prime.

It is a super-2 number, since 2×9018142612 = 1626537922685952242, which contains 22 as substring.

It is equal to p46097420 and since 901814261 and 46097420 have the same sum of digits, it is a Honaker prime.

It is a congruent number.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (901814201) by changing a digit.

It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (17) of ones.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 450907130 + 450907131.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (450907131).

Almost surely, 2901814261 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

901814261 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

901814261 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

901814261 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 3456, while the sum is 32.

The square root of 901814261 is about 30030.2224600485. Note that the first 3 decimals coincide. The cubic root of 901814261 is about 966.1377083221.

The spelling of 901814261 in words is "nine hundred one million, eight hundred fourteen thousand, two hundred sixty-one".