Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1011011110100… |
… | …00100000100101 |
3 | 20201011020202002 |
4 | 11233100200211 |
5 | 144121240334 |
6 | 13315255045 |
7 | 2246214404 |
oct | 557204045 |
9 | 221136662 |
10 | 96274469 |
11 | 4a387485 |
12 | 282aa485 |
13 | 16c3ab55 |
14 | cb0163b |
15 | 86bab7e |
hex | 5bd0825 |
96274469 has 4 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 96315180. Its totient is φ = 96233760.
The previous prime is 96274459. The next prime is 96274487. The reversal of 96274469 is 96447269.
It is a happy number.
It is a semiprime because it is the product of two primes.
It can be written as a sum of positive squares in 2 ways, for example, as 2765569 + 93508900 = 1663^2 + 9670^2 .
It is a cyclic number.
It is a de Polignac number, because none of the positive numbers 2k-96274469 is a prime.
It is a super-3 number, since 3×962744693 (a number of 25 digits) contains 333 as substring. Note that it is a super-d number also for d = 2.
It is a Duffinian number.
It is a congruent number.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (96274459) by changing a digit.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 3 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 16574 + ... + 21615.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (24078795).
Almost surely, 296274469 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
96274469 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (40711).
96274469 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
96274469 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.
The sum of its prime factors is 40710.
The product of its digits is 653184, while the sum is 47.
The square root of 96274469 is about 9811.9554116394. The cubic root of 96274469 is about 458.3216548282.
The spelling of 96274469 in words is "ninety-six million, two hundred seventy-four thousand, four hundred sixty-nine".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.069 sec. • engine limits •