Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1001001011111101001010… |
… | …0001100000001111111110 |
3 | 1022202122110001202111121000 |
4 | 2102333102201200033332 |
5 | 2310443322012023402 |
6 | 33252200235551130 |
7 | 2061526125205515 |
oct | 222772241401776 |
9 | 38678401674530 |
10 | 10101000111102 |
11 | 32448a025941a |
12 | 11717845bb4a6 |
13 | 58369bc13884 |
14 | 26cc68d2967c |
15 | 127b3bd81c1c |
hex | 92fd28603fe |
10101000111102 has 64 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 23429587576320. Its totient is φ = 3219649171200.
The previous prime is 10101000111101. The next prime is 10101000111109. The reversal of 10101000111102 is 20111100010101.
It is a Harshad number since it is a multiple of its sum of digits (9).
It is a congruent number.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (10101000111101) by changing a digit.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (23) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 31 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 2964477 + ... + 5384247.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (366087305880).
Almost surely, 210101000111102 is an apocalyptic number.
10101000111102 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (13328587465218).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
10101000111102 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
10101000111102 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 2423166 (or 2423160 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 2, while the sum is 9.
Adding to 10101000111102 its reverse (20111100010101), we get a palindrome (30212100121203).
The spelling of 10101000111102 in words is "ten trillion, one hundred one billion, one hundred eleven thousand, one hundred two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.074 sec. • engine limits •