Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 111101011010001… |
… | …110000011000101 |
3 | 2122210122211012201 |
4 | 331122032003011 |
5 | 4102223032321 |
6 | 250122314501 |
7 | 34350156604 |
oct | 7532160305 |
9 | 2583584181 |
10 | 1030283461 |
11 | 489628239 |
12 | 249058a31 |
13 | 1355b11ac |
14 | 9ab91a3b |
15 | 606b4291 |
hex | 3d68e0c5 |
1030283461 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 1030283462. Its totient is φ = 1030283460.
The previous prime is 1030283431. The next prime is 1030283479. The reversal of 1030283461 is 1643820301.
1030283461 is digitally balanced in base 2, because in such base it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.
It is a strong prime.
It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 975375361 + 54908100 = 31231^2 + 7410^2 .
It is a cyclic number.
It is not a de Polignac number, because 1030283461 - 213 = 1030275269 is a prime.
It is a super-2 number, since 2×10302834612 = 2122968020020277042, which contains 22 as substring.
It is a congruent number.
It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (1030283431) by changing a digit.
It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 515141730 + 515141731.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (515141731).
Almost surely, 21030283461 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
1030283461 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).
1030283461 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.
1030283461 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 3456, while the sum is 28.
The square root of 1030283461 is about 32098.0289270229. The cubic root of 1030283461 is about 1009.9942688300.
The spelling of 1030283461 in words is "one billion, thirty million, two hundred eighty-three thousand, four hundred sixty-one".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.082 sec. • engine limits •