Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 11110001000011111010… |
… | …11101001110100001101 |
3 | 10122222102100002200000010 |
4 | 33010033223221310031 |
5 | 113430344124020140 |
6 | 2111344444223433 |
7 | 134541641444031 |
oct | 17041753516415 |
9 | 3588370080003 |
10 | 1035350220045 |
11 | 36a0a9231489 |
12 | 1487a883ab79 |
13 | 7682cc218cb |
14 | 3817b27a1c1 |
15 | 1bde9e25880 |
hex | f10fae9d0d |
1035350220045 has 32 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 1711875538944. Its totient is φ = 533787508800.
The previous prime is 1035350220043. The next prime is 1035350220119. The reversal of 1035350220045 is 5400220535301.
It is not a de Polignac number, because 1035350220045 - 21 = 1035350220043 is a prime.
It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 1035350219994 and 1035350220021.
It is a congruent number.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (1035350220043) by changing a digit.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 31 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 798427 + ... + 1645656.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (53496110592).
Almost surely, 21035350220045 is an apocalyptic number.
1035350220045 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (15) formed by its first and last digit.
It is an amenable number.
1035350220045 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (676525318899).
1035350220045 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
1035350220045 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.
The sum of its prime factors is 2445033.
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 18000, while the sum is 30.
Adding to 1035350220045 its reverse (5400220535301), we get a palindrome (6435570755346).
The spelling of 1035350220045 in words is "one trillion, thirty-five billion, three hundred fifty million, two hundred twenty thousand, forty-five".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.069 sec. • engine limits •