Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 110001011100000000… |
… | …1000101010001101010 |
3 | 101011000221000100001010 |
4 | 1202320001011101222 |
5 | 3214412111202402 |
6 | 120434444404350 |
7 | 10445622262602 |
oct | 1427001052152 |
9 | 334027010033 |
10 | 106166506602 |
11 | 41030252852 |
12 | 186aab466b6 |
13 | a01c236710 |
14 | 51d2013c02 |
15 | 2b657b2a6c |
hex | 18b804546a |
106166506602 has 64 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 233091323136. Its totient is φ = 32035061760.
The previous prime is 106166506601. The next prime is 106166506613. The reversal of 106166506602 is 206605661601.
It is a super-2 number, since 2×1061665066022 (a number of 23 digits) contains 22 as substring.
It is a Harshad number since it is a multiple of its sum of digits (39).
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (106166506601) by changing a digit.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 31 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 11202538 + ... + 11212010.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (3642051924).
Almost surely, 2106166506602 is an apocalyptic number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 106166506602, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (116545661568).
106166506602 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (126924816534).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
106166506602 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
106166506602 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.
The sum of its prime factors is 12255.
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 77760, while the sum is 39.
The spelling of 106166506602 in words is "one hundred six billion, one hundred sixty-six million, five hundred six thousand, six hundred two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.067 sec. • engine limits •